NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Brokerage that works: Balanced triads and the brokerage roles that matter for innovation

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Brokerage that works: Balanced triads and the brokerage roles that matter for innovation

dc.contributor.author	Llopis Córcoles, Óscar
dc.contributor.author	D'Este, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned	2023-06-29T06:51:12Z
dc.date.available	2023-06-30T04:45:06Z
dc.date.issued	2022	es_ES
dc.identifier.citation	Llopis, O. & D’Este, P. (2022). Brokerage that works: Balanced triads and the brokerage roles that matter for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39, 492– 514.	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88580
dc.description.abstract	A key premise in innovation literature suggests that individuals enabling contact between pairs of otherwise disconnected others (i.e., holding open triads) are more innovative, as they benefit from more opportunities for knowledge recombination. Such benefits also come with a cost, as conducting innovative action from open triads requires finding common ground to coordinate and integrate disparate knowledge and efforts from unconnected others. However, it is yet unclear which specific open triadic structures offer the greatest net value to facilitate individual innovativeness. We contribute to this debate by going beyond a homogeneous conceptualization of open triads, examining the relation between different brokerage roles and individual innovativeness. We theorize that some roles are more balanced than others in terms of access to knowledge novelty and integration costs. Specifically, we find that balanced open triads (gatekeepers and itinerant roles) are crucial to facilitate individual innovativeness, as compared to unbalanced open triads (coordinator and liaison roles). We also propose that brokers obtain the greatest innovation benefits from balanced open triads when they are embedded in institutional settings that are distant from knowledge applicability. We test our ideas through a large-scale study of 1,010 biomedical scientists.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Wiley	es_ES
dc.subject	brokerage roles	es_ES
dc.subject	innovation involvement	es_ES
dc.subject	institutional theory	es_ES
dc.subject	medical innovation	es_ES
dc.subject	open triads	es_ES
dc.title	Brokerage that works: Balanced triads and the brokerage roles that matter for innovation	es_ES
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.1111/jpim.12618	es_ES
dc.accrualmethod	S	es_ES
dc.embargo.terms	0 days	es_ES
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES