NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Which irrigating provides a better bond strength in glass fiber posts: Chlorhexidine or Sodium Hypochlorite? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Which irrigating provides a better bond strength in glass fiber posts: Chlorhexidine or Sodium Hypochlorite? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Júnior, Eneas-Pereira-da Silva es
dc.contributor.author Araújo, Sarah-Freitas es
dc.contributor.author de Assis, Cláudio-Paulo-Pereira es
dc.contributor.author da Silva, André-Rodrigo-Justino es
dc.contributor.author Lago, Maria-Catarina-Almeida es
dc.contributor.author Braz, Rodivan es
dc.date.accessioned 2023-09-25T11:11:38Z
dc.date.available 2023-09-25T11:11:38Z
dc.date.issued 2023 es
dc.identifier.citation Júnior, E. S., Araújo, S., de Assis, C., da Silva, A., Lago, M., & Braz, R. (2023). Which irrigating provides a better bond strength in glass fiber posts: Chlorhexidine or sodium hypochlorite? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 15(8), 666-677 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/89599
dc.description.abstract The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the influence of the use of chlorhexidine on endodontic instrumentation on the bond strength of glass fiber posts with resin cements. The guiding question of the study was: “Is the bond strength of glass fiber posts greater when using chlorhexidine as an irrigator in endodontic treatment instead of sodium hypochlorite?”.This study was conducted according to Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). In vitro studies were included that have compared chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigator in the chemical-mechanical preparation.Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis and seven in the meta-analysis. Both the analysis by subgroups and the total analysis, using a random effect model, showed no statistically significant differences between the groups (p> 0.05), either in the specific analysis for cervical root third (p = 0.30; 95% CI = -2.11, 6.91) or medium (p = 0.05; 95% CI = -0.03, 4.56), or nonspecific regarding the third to the root third (p = 0.48; 95% CI = -4.00, 1.86).There are no statistically significant differences in the bond strength of glass fiber posts and resin cements in teeth endodontically treated under irrigation by both chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. es
dc.subject Chlorhexidine es
dc.subject sodium hypochlorite es
dc.subject bond strength es
dc.subject glass fiber post es
dc.title Which irrigating provides a better bond strength in glass fiber posts: Chlorhexidine or Sodium Hypochlorite? A systematic review with meta-analysis es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/jced.60553 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES
dc.identifier.url http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/aop/60553.pdf

Visualització       (1.243Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques