NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Problems associated with authorship of scientific publications: coauthorship dissatisfaction index

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Problems associated with authorship of scientific publications: coauthorship dissatisfaction index

dc.contributor.author	Gómez-Ferri, Javier
dc.contributor.author	González Alcaide, Gregorio
dc.contributor.author	Llopis-Goig, Ramón
dc.date.accessioned	2023-11-18T08:36:35Z
dc.date.available	2023-11-19T05:45:08Z
dc.date.issued	2019	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/91248
dc.description.abstract	Increasing levels of collaboration constitute one of the characteristics of science. However, the knowledge production system is based on a fundamental discordance: on the one hand, it is cooperative in nature, with links articulated through coauthorships, and on the other, the systems for assigning merit and distributing rewards function on an individual scale. This contradiction can give rise to dysfunction and mala praxis. This study analyzes researchers’ perceptions about the problems associated with authorship in scientific publications. We propose a coauthorship dissatisfaction index that measures the degree of dissatisfaction with the author order on the byline, ghost authors, and hyperauthorship. There are differences in this regard according to the branch of knowledge, status in the academic hierarchy, and sex. Using a sample of 2344 researchers, we observed an overall dissatisfaction rate of 12.4%. The highest rates were in the areas of Health Sciences and Social Sciences, in early-stage career academics, and in women. The cognizant authorities should take steps to regulate authorship, tailoring rules to each area of knowledge, with an eye toward reducing discrimination, gender bias, and abuse of authority.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Elsevier	es_ES
dc.source	Gómez-Ferri, J., González-Alcaide, G., & Llopis-Goig R. (2019). Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: an empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception. Journal of Informetrics, 13, 100980. Doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.100980	es_ES
dc.subject	Co-authorship	es_ES
dc.subject	Research collaboration	es_ES
dc.subject	Scientific misbehavior	es_ES
dc.title	Problems associated with authorship of scientific publications: coauthorship dissatisfaction index	es_ES
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::LINGÜÍSTICA::Lingüística aplicada::Documentación	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::ÉTICA::Ética de individuos	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.1016/j.joi.2019.100980	es_ES
dc.accrualmethod	-	es_ES
dc.embargo.terms	0 days	es_ES
dc.type.hasVersion	AO	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES