NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC.: a dog study

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC.: a dog study

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Calvo Guirado, José Luis es
dc.contributor.author Aguilar Salvatierra, Antonio es
dc.contributor.author Guardia Muñoz, Javier es
dc.contributor.author Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio es
dc.contributor.author Ramírez Fernández, Piedad es
dc.contributor.author Pérez Sánchez, Cristina es
dc.contributor.author Gómez Moreno, Gerardo es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-21T12:15:11Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-21T12:15:11Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.citation Calvo Guirado, José Luis ; Aguilar Salvatierra, Antonio ; Guardia, Javier ; Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ; Ramírez Fernández, Piedad ; Pérez Sánchez, Cristina ; Gómez Moreno, Gerardo. Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC.: a dog study. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2012, Vol. 4, No. 1: 8-13 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/35231
dc.description.abstract Objetives: The aim of this study was to determine which of three methods for measuring BIC (bone-to-implant contact), using vestibular and lingual scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for different implant systems at 15, 30 and 90 days post-surgery was the most precise. An elemental analysis with SEM was used to evaluate neoformed bone composition for three implant systems at the same study times. Material and Methods: 36 implants were placed in eighteen Beagle dogs mandible about one year old and weighing approximately 12-13 kg in order to evaluate bone apposition to three different implant surfaces. It was used the third and fourth premolar and first molar distal sockets in both quadrants of the mandible (3P3, 4P4 and 1M1). Teeth were hemi-sected and the distal roots were removed. The specimens were prepared for histological examination and each section surface was stained using Masson's trichrome and hematoxylin and eosin stains. BIC evaluations were performed by the three methods, BIC I (the quantity of mineralized bone in direct contact with the implant's titanium surface across the entire threaded area); BIC II (along a line that passes from apex to apex of the implant threads); BIC III (both in areas around and above the threads and in between threads). Results: Both BIC and bone content were analyzed for all implants placed in P3, P4 y M1 alveoli on both, the buccal and palatine sides (elemental analysis quantified Ca, P, O and C). It was seen it was only at the ninety-day mark that high percentages of calcium were present. Conclusions: This study suggest that BIC III evaluation is the most certain method for establishing the quantity of bone formed as the BIC area. en_US
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC.: a dog study es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (476.8Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques