NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Conflict of interest reporting in dentistry meta-analyses: a systematic review

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Conflict of interest reporting in dentistry meta-analyses: a systematic review

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Beyari, Mohammed M. es
dc.contributor.author Strain, Dan es
dc.contributor.author Li, Chuan Silvia es
dc.contributor.author Lamfon, Hanadi A. es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-09-17T10:58:07Z
dc.date.available 2014-09-17T10:58:07Z
dc.date.issued 2014 es
dc.identifier.citation Beyari, Mohammed M. ; Strain, Dan ; Li, Chuan Silvia ; Lamfon, Hanadi A.. Conflict of interest reporting in dentistry meta-analyses: a systematic review. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2014, Vol. 6, No. 3: 280-285 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/37964
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The issue of reporting conflicts of interest (COI) in medical research has come under scrutiny over the past decade. Absolute transparency is important when dealing with conflicts of interest to provide readers with all essential information required to make an informative decision of the results. The key objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of reporting conflicts of interest in therapeutic dental meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), and to investigate possible associations with other categorical variables. Study Design: We conducted an extensive literature search across multiple databases to search for relevant review articles for this study. We utilized pre-determined key words, and relied on three reviewers to test and review the use of a data extraction form that was used for the meta-analyses. Data regarding study characteristics, direction of results, and the significance of the results from each meta-analysis were extracted. Results: There were 129 meta-analyses used in this review, and the reporting on conflict of interest was low with only 50 (38.8%) of the articles possessing a conflict of interest statement (either confirming of denying COI). Of these 50 articles, there were only 4 (8%) studies that reported an actual conflict of interest. A statement of conflicts of interest was found in 29 (35.3%) of the papers that reported significant findings, whereas 35% of the papers that reported positive results reported on conflict of interest. Prior to 2009, only 17 (25%) papers reported conflicts of interest, but since 2009, 54.1% of papers collected had a conflict of interest statement. Conclusions: Meta-analyses published in the field of dentistry do not routinely report author conflicts of interest. Although few conflicts appear to exist, the field of dentistry should continue to ensure that best evidence reports provide clear and transparent reporting of potential conflicts of interest in academic journals. en_US
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Conflict of interest reporting in dentistry meta-analyses: a systematic review es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (1.435Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques