Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Zurriaga Carda, J. | es |
dc.contributor.author | Gilabert, E. | es |
dc.contributor.author | Mifsut Miedes, Damian | es |
dc.contributor.author | Gargallo, E. | es |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez, J.R. | es |
dc.contributor.author | Rodriguez Calderon, A. | es |
dc.contributor.author | Silvestre Muñoz, Antonio | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-02T10:49:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-02T10:49:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Zurriaga Carda, J. ; Gilabert, E. ; Mifsut Miedes, Damian ; Gargallo, E. ; Rodríguez, J.R. ; Rodriguez Calderon, A. ; Silvestre Muñoz, Antonio. Ácido tranexámico más bloqueo anestésico con adrenalina frente a recuperador de sangre en artroplastia total de rodilla primaria. : eficacia como protocolos en el ahorro de sangre. En: Revista española de cirugía osteoarticular, 52 271 2018: 17-21 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10550/65924 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of the present study was to compare two blood-saving protocols: the use of the postoperative blood recuperator for autotransfusion (RSPA), the use of intraoperative tranexamic intravenous (ATX) and intra-articular ATX, and anesthetic block with Adrenaline intrarticular. Material and method. Retrospective descriptive observational study of a series of 54 patients operated in our Center by Gonarthrosis, and who were implanted with a total primary knee prosthesis in 2015. They were divided into two groups: group A, patients treated with ATX and anesthetic block according to the protocol described below, and group B, patients in whom a blood recuperator was used during the immediate postoperative period for autotransfusion. Results. The ATX and RSPA groups were comparable in terms of demographic values (ATX 71.59 - recovery 68.63) and distribution by sex (ATX 66.7% women, 33.3% men / recuperator 59.3% women, 40.7% men) similar. The data analysis, the mean hemoglobin decrease was lower in the ATX group (2.23 g / dL), compared to 2.73 g / dL in the group of the recuperator, this difference being not statistically significant (p value of 0.15). Conclusion. The protocol for the use of ATX was more effective as a blood-saving program compared to the use of autologous blood recuperator in primary ATR, although it would be necessary to study a greater number of cases. | es |
dc.title | Ácido tranexámico más bloqueo anestésico con adrenalina frente a recuperador de sangre en artroplastia total de rodilla primaria. : eficacia como protocolos en el ahorro de sangre | es |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS | es |
dc.identifier.doi | es | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |