NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

dc.contributor.author	Casino, Gonzalo	es
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.issued	2018	es
dc.identifier.citation	Casino, Gonzalo. Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 8 2018: 156-163	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79676
dc.description.abstract	Pseudoscience (false science) and science based on faulty and biased studies (bad science) produce false or uncertain knowledge, with poor or no evidence. Both represent a health risk: pseudoscience-based therapies because they can replace or delay conventional treatments, and low-quality biomedicine because it promotes medical interventions that can be dangerous. In the press, alternative therapies are less prevalent than low-quality research, while the former tends to be framed negatively and the latter favourably. Both require more thorough and rigorous studies to better understand their negative effects on critical thinking, economics, and health-related decision making.	es
dc.title	Pseudoscience and bad science in biomedicine : analysis of evidence, health risk, and media dissemination	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco		es
dc.identifier.doi		es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES